The Site / The Fight

by Yonah Freemark
yfreemark (at) thetransportpolitic (dot) com

  • Le progrès ne vaut que s'il est partagé par tous.

Archives

Canadian High-Speed Rail Acquires Conservative Support

Windsor-Québec City corridor first priorityWinsor Québec City High Speed Rail

Now on the plate of Canada’s ruling Conservative party: high-speed rail. The Tories, whose leader Steven Harper recently came close to being replaced by a rogue coalition of the Liberal, New Democratic, and Bloc Québequois parties, have been searching for a popular initiative to improve their popularity ratings, which have been falling steadily. Senator Leo Housakos, the Tory Party’s representative in largely opposition Montréal, has argued in favor of new and faster services along the Windsor-London-Toronto-Ottawa-Montréal-Québec corridor, which by itself reaches fifty percent of the Canadian population.

An independent group called High-Speed Rail Canada has been pushing for this type of improved service for twenty years, but the government has yet decide the ultimate routing or what kind of train technologies to use. One thing, however, seems sure: that the service should at the minimum connect Canada’s two biggest cities – Toronto and Montréal – with the national capital at Ottawa. In ideal conditions, that route would have a decreased travel time from 5 hours today on VIA Rail Canada service to 2.5 hours on electrified high-speed rail running at speeds above 150 mph. Based on foreign experience, investing in such a corridor would likely result in the almost complete suppression of flights between the cities and dramatically reduce automobile congestion between the cities.

But the government hasn’t yet made clear whether it would be willing to invest the tens of billions of dollars necessary to make such a project reality. It may also choose to simply upgrade existing VIA corridors to faster speeds. Another alternative that would reduce costs: taking advantage of Bombardier’s JetTrain technology, which allows very fast train speeds without corridor electrification. The fundamental problem with the JetTrain, of course, is its negative environmental impact.

The most effective economic generator, however, would be a full investment in very high-speed rail. But unless the Canadian government, in association with the provinces of Ontario and Québec, are willing to put up a very big sum of money from the start, this project will go nowhere.

Image above: from VIA Rail Canada

Related Posts with Thumbnails
4 Comments | Leave a Reply »
Leave a Reply

 

 

 

Comment preview below as you type. You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

For help if you have trouble posting or your comment is marked as spam, please email:
info (at) thetransportpolitic.com | Comment Rules

@ttpolitic

Connect

Upcoming Transit Line Openings: 2012

Early
  • ▶ Sacramento Green Line to the River District LRT
March
  • ▶ Las Vegas Sahara Corridor BRT
April
  • ▶ 23: Rhode Island Wickford Junction Extension CR
  • ▶ 28: Los Angeles Expo Line Phase 1A LRT
Spring
  • ▶ Boston Fitchburg Line Extension CR
June
  • ▶ Los Angeles Expo Line Phase 1B LRT
  • ▶ New Orleans Loyola/UPT Streetcar
July
  • ▶ 30: Dallas Orange Line Phase II LRT
Summer
  • ▶ Los Angeles Orange Line Canoga Extension BRT
  • ▶ Miami Airport Link Metro
  • ▶ New York Nostrand/Rogers BRT
  • ▶ San Antonio Via Primo BRT
September
  • ▶ 21: Portland Streetcar Loop
October
  • ▶ Seattle Sounder Lakewood Extension CR
Fall
  • ▶ Calgary Northeast Line Extension LRT
  • ▶ Chicago Jeffery Corridor BRT
  • ▶ Los Angeles El Monte Transit Center
  • ▶ Seattle RapidRide C & D Lines BRT
  • ▶ Twin Cities Cedar Avenue BRT
December
  • ▶ Dallas Blue Line Extension LRT
  • ▶ 3: Dallas Orange Line Phase II LRT
  • ▶ 10: Salt Lake FrontRunner South CR
  • ▶ Montréal Train de l'Est CR

Network

rss feed
comments feed
twitter feed
email update