Comments on: High-Speed Rail Gets Massive Boost from Stimulus Bill?

By: S.P. Gass

S.P. Gass — Sat, 14 Feb 2009 05:22:16 +0000

Sounds good, but I’d really like some new steam trains instead of electric engines: http://lowtechtimes.com/2009/02/12/englands-new-a1-tornado-steam-engine/

By: Norman Brown

Norman Brown — Fri, 13 Feb 2009 03:26:41 +0000

Its easy to pass bond issues, ask Governor Pataki. California sells 10B worth of bonds, what are those bonds based on, future fares? And even if California gets half the money it is only a down payment.

By: PPP

PPP — Thu, 12 Feb 2009 23:44:04 +0000

I agree. This is a gift to California, they have been pushing for it though. They already $10 billion bonds for HSR. They still need $25 billion more for the project. We´ll see if local authorities give their supprt to it too

By: Steve

Steve — Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:27:14 +0000

I don’t consider what they have in the NE Corridor as high speed rail. Average speed is below 110. Closer to highway speeds.

By: NikolasM

NikolasM — Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:37:49 +0000

My wife works in the non profit government public health sector and she told me that the next Budget would reflect many of the focii of this stimulus. Thus having $8 billion for HSR is fantastic for future prospects additional funding.

By: Patrick M

Patrick M — Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:30:25 +0000

$8 billion for HSR is indeed staggering. The way the press release on TPM is written, though, has this sort of “lumping” together of all things transit and rail. It is possible the way the legislation is written that instead of this money being specifically tied up for HSR, that it will wind up in commuter rail/amtrak/transit projects instead. It seems like Sen. Kerry took to the floor not knowing the difference the other day, therefore, I imagine their staffers putting the bill together might not know, either.

Here’s another point to consider- this is from Pelosi’s office, and if the HSR bill says anything about speeds mostly above 150 mph, this bill is essentially a gift to California. Nobody else is even talking about speeds like that, and the few other areas with reasonably functioning HSR development programs (NC/VA, Midwest) are talking about 110 mph service mostly.

Re-tooling those programs for 150 mph would take longer than the stimulus bill’s timeframe, for sure.

By: David Galvan

David Galvan — Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:20:35 +0000

I’m confused. . . why would the conference committee, which apparently only met for 1 day or so, suddenly boost the HSR funding by over 6 billion more than was agreed upon in either bill? $8 billion doesn’t seem like a compromise between two bills when one bill had $2 billion appropriated and another had much less.

But hey, if it’s true, I won’t look a gift horse in the mouth! If Senator Kerry’s HSR bill eventually makes it’s way through as well, it looks like CA will be getting the HSR system that voters approved state funding for in November!

By: PPP

PPP — Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:08:24 +0000

Not bad! that´s much more money than it was planned. Hopefully that´s right.
I was surprised by the $7 billion for broadband services too, isn´t it too much?