Sydney CBD Metro Faces Stumbling Block

Sydney MetroTerminating all western train services at Central Station won’t be as easy as originally imagined

The Sydney CBD Metro project, which will provide train services from Balmain west of downtown, through the center city, and then south to Central Train Station, is in trouble because of a lack of coordination between the metro authority and the regional rail provider, CityRail. The project’s requirements would unduly overcrowd the platforms at Central and make existing CityRail operation no longer feasible. The Metro project plan must be revised before shovels are put into the ground next year.

Original plans for the 4.8 billion dollar (Australian) project, expected to be completed by 2015, would have required all Western suburban CityRail services to terminate at Central, rather than continue into the city core along the City Circle, as currently. Suburban trains are overcrowded and the Metro would provide much-needed relief. But it would also cause headaches for customers attempting to make it into downtown, who would have to switch to a Metro train at Central in order to complete their journeys. Without forcing customers to make this change, the Metro will likely have very low ridership. In other words, the Metro’s viability relies on a decrease in the quality of services currently offered.

The problem for Metro is that stopping CityRail trains at Central – 26 of them an hour – wouldn’t be possible because of the necessary turn-around time and limited platforms at the station. Metro’s response to the problem is that “The reference… refers to a future opportunity – and not a requirement before the CBD Metro opens.” Is the authority suggesting that Central be expanded to deal with the capacity problems caused by Metro? Is it worth spending even more money to pay for a hugely costly expansion? Or is Metro arguing that it would be acceptable to begin services with little ridership, as CityRail trains wouldn’t have to terminate?

This isn’t to say that the Metro project shouldn’t be considered at all. But with CityRail lines overflowing and more capacity needed into the CBD, the answer isn’t an elimination of existing service. Rather, what would make more sense would be a new CityRail offering into downtown along the Metro alignment, splitting off at Central from existing lines and then continuing along the planned Metro route. While it’s nice to imagine a new Metro in Sydney, improving the existing network by providing an alternative to the City Circle, as well as providing new services to Rozell and White Bay, as the Metro is planned to do, would decongest the routes through the CBD and open up new service opportunities. There’s no reason to think that metro-like services to the west and south couldn’t be provided along new alignments and connecting to the new CityRail tunnel.

Image above: Sydney CBD Metro Plan, from Sydney Metro

5 Comments | Leave a Reply »
  • Tony Bailey

    This report has some alarmingingly incorrect statements in it and is unsourced. I suspect that you have been “shafted”.

    See the response at-

    http://www.sydneymetro.nsw.gov.au/news/latest_news/media_statement/

  • Tony -
    Thanks for your comment – I may have pushed forward a little too quickly with this info. That said, I still think that a new CityRail line makes a lot more sense for the corridor than an independent metro line. Any comments?

  • Tony Bailey

    Indeed,

    And there is a very easy way of doing it, for about the same price as the Metro-

    Put in the two extra tracks from Chatswood to North Sydney, for which there is room, take back the Cahill Expressway and convert back to a railway, tunnel from Wynyard through Central and Redfern and exit at about Erskineville and suddenly many extra peak hour paths through the City.l

    Doing this opens up lots of other possibilities -

    restore the planned Epping to Parramatta link, build the North West Line, build a junction at Roseville underground and make the badly needed connection to the Warringah Peninsula

  • switchingmodes

    This sounds very similar to the San Francisco Transbay Terminal issues that have been brought up recently, at least as far as the dis-coordination problems. I have posted an article on how better planning with this project could produce a better result. It is available here.

  • David Hunt

    For the sake of us all, let’s hope the Keneally Labor Government will reassess the dilemma over the expensive CBD Metro. The CBD Metro is just not worth it. For anyone. Let’s solve our problems in Sydney without adding to them. As someone working for one of the businnesses that will be destroyed by the CBD Metro, I wait with nail biting time until the Premiers announcement next week. The businesses also wait in Pyrmont and the public also waits. Also will the public still have to bail out the Sydney City Council, owners of the Woolworths Building in Park Street to the tune of 500 million?

    David Hunt
    Rozelle

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

Comment preview below as you type. You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

For help if you have trouble posting or your comment is marked as spam, please email:
info (at) thetransportpolitic.com | Comment Rules

The Site / The Fight

by Yonah Freemark

yfreemark (at) thetransportpolitic (dot) com

  • Le progrès ne vaut que s'il est partagé par tous.

Email newsletter

Network

rss feed
comments feed
twitter feed
email update