Could Jerusalem Light Rail be a Train to Peace?

Arabs, already benefiting from rising land values around line under construction, clamor for more — including an extension into Palestine

Jerusalem’s almost-completed first phase of its new light rail system has generated considerable controversy — so much so that Mayor Nir Barkat has threatened replacing future extensions with bus rapid transit. The first 14-km project, which is expected to be completed next year, will extend through much of the metropolis, directly next to the Old City, and north past the 1949 Armistice Agreement “Green” Line towards Jewish settlements in the occupied West Bank. These areas are on the Israeli side of the controversial West Bank Wall, even though they’re within the theoretically Palestinian zone.

Al Bawaba reports that Arabs living in Israeli territory — that is, non-Jews living in Israel — see the light rail’s construction as highly advantageous, and want its expansion further north into the West Bank. Already, rent prices for commercial storefronts along the route have increased by an astonishing ten times in anticipation of the rail system’s opening. The system is expected to make getting around the congested capital city far easier and unsurprisingly is projected to attract thousands of commuters, which is the obvious explanation for the sudden rise in property value.

Could the system be extended north to Ramallah, in truly Palestinian territory, as some of those interviewed for Al Bawaba’s article suggest? After all, shouldn’t the seriously impoverished West Bank be able to take advantage of some of the same positive economic effects that come with a new light rail system?

The obstacles are huge. Ramallah sits on the other side of the West Bank Wall, meaning the operation of a light rail line there would require the lifting of border checkpoints that today are required for people passing from one side of the barrier to the other. For those security facilities to be eliminated, Israel would have to be assured of a permanent peace with the Palestinians, something that neither side has been able to make possible… ever.

It’s a pipe dream, in other words, very unlikely in the next few decades.

The excitement over the possibilities for a new transit line suggest that Jerusalem’s line will be quite effective in transforming the daily habits of Israelis, decreasing commuting times and expanding connections between neighborhoods that have kept segregated for decades. It will be nice to watch Jews and Arabs commuting together, between Arab villages and Jewish towns, in modern rail vehicles. It will be yet another symbol of the ability of two peoples to live their lives in close proximity with one another.

An extension to Ramallah will never be allowed by the existing Israeli government, but a future in which conflict between these two states has been abandoned is possible and acheivable. When that day comes, transit can play an important part in making a working connection between the two happen.

10 Comments | Leave a Reply »
  • Harry

    Apologies to Cat Stevens, Yonah.

  • Andy Lynch

    This will probably happen the same time as the West Bank to Gaza rail line. In other words, don’t hold your breath.

    Otherwise, it’s nice to show that rents around a streetcar line are on the rise.

  • It’s interesting. I’d always thought it would be the other way around: the settlers would be huge supporters of the project, and the Arabs would get shafted.

  • Stewart Clamen

    Are there any existing light-rail lines that traverse an international boundary requiring passport control?

  • JoeC

    There was a study published by the Rand Institute not long ago called teh ARC (http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9119/index1.html), which recommended a high speed rail line between the West Bank and Gaza as a means of improving economic politicla ties between the two sides of the Palestinian state and allwoing it a measure of independance (although it seems that Isreal is not currently amenable to that idea). It would be a secured line through Isreal, but is intended to focus dvelopment in Palestine, and also focus the identity of the Palestinian state on a disceet peice of infrastructrure. The plan also included a link to a new Palestinean airport and sea port in Gaza.

  • The problem with Gaza isn’t that there’s no airport or seaport. It’s that Israel’s blockading them.

  • as

    would the train be equally open to all?
    arab- israeli, and palestinian- and jew alike?
    as jerusalem will be an important base of this rail, will women have to sit in the back of the train as is now common on many public bus lines in jerusalem?
    amazing how complicated building a train could be….

  • AS: I thought women only had to sit in the back on bus lines operated by Haredi companies. The Egged lines don’t have these rules, do they?

  • as

    Alon,
    According to a speech I heard a few weeks ago, given by an activist Israeli woman who lives in Jerusalem, public buses running throughout Jerusalem, paid for by tax dollars of all citizens, are increasingly enforcing this segregated seating system. The numbers of lines with this rule is growing and is not restricted to routes in the orthodox neighborhoods.

  • Can you tell me to subscribe this site through other ways instead of using RSS? I never make it work on any readers though I can read it on opera.

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

Comment preview below as you type. You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


one × = 8

For help if you have trouble posting or your comment is marked as spam, please email:
info (at) thetransportpolitic.com | Comment Rules

The Site / The Fight

by Yonah Freemark

yfreemark (at) thetransportpolitic (dot) com

  • Le progrès ne vaut que s'il est partagé par tous.

Email newsletter

Network

rss feed
comments feed
twitter feed
email update