<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: U.S. DOT to Designate Las Vegas-Southern California as HSR Corridor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2009/07/02/u-s-dot-to-designate-las-vegas-southern-california-as-hsr-corridor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2009/07/02/u-s-dot-to-designate-las-vegas-southern-california-as-hsr-corridor/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 16:27:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathanael</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2009/07/02/u-s-dot-to-designate-las-vegas-southern-california-as-hsr-corridor/#comment-1806</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathanael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 10:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetransportpolitic.com/?p=2586#comment-1806</guid>
		<description>&quot;However, part of the 18 month delay on a new transportation bill or possibly a second stimulus could be an equivalent of the Interstate Highway Defense Act. I think the feds will, through increased general funding and fuel taxes, fund every single corridor.

This will draw much more support in both houses for a transportation bill and could mean that we get real TGV-quality networks.&quot;

Optimist!  I really doubt this but I hope you&#039;re right.  If something like this happened, *my* area might actually get fast trains.  Heck, my city might even get a train!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;However, part of the 18 month delay on a new transportation bill or possibly a second stimulus could be an equivalent of the Interstate Highway Defense Act. I think the feds will, through increased general funding and fuel taxes, fund every single corridor.</p>
<p>This will draw much more support in both houses for a transportation bill and could mean that we get real TGV-quality networks.&#8221;</p>
<p>Optimist!  I really doubt this but I hope you&#8217;re right.  If something like this happened, *my* area might actually get fast trains.  Heck, my city might even get a train!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cameron Slick</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2009/07/02/u-s-dot-to-designate-las-vegas-southern-california-as-hsr-corridor/#comment-1805</link>
		<dc:creator>Cameron Slick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 17:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetransportpolitic.com/?p=2586#comment-1805</guid>
		<description>With 12 designated &quot;networks&quot; (a corridors would be Minneapolis-Chicago), and $13 billion over five years, the DOT would be stretched too thin, considering the entire California network would cost $45 billion. However, part of the 18 month delay on a new transportation bill or possibly a second stimulus could be an equivalent of the Interstate Highway Defense Act. I think the feds will, through increased general funding and fuel taxes, fund every single corridor.

This will draw much more support in both houses for a transportation bill and could mean that we get real TGV-quality networks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With 12 designated &#8220;networks&#8221; (a corridors would be Minneapolis-Chicago), and $13 billion over five years, the DOT would be stretched too thin, considering the entire California network would cost $45 billion. However, part of the 18 month delay on a new transportation bill or possibly a second stimulus could be an equivalent of the Interstate Highway Defense Act. I think the feds will, through increased general funding and fuel taxes, fund every single corridor.</p>
<p>This will draw much more support in both houses for a transportation bill and could mean that we get real TGV-quality networks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wad</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2009/07/02/u-s-dot-to-designate-las-vegas-southern-california-as-hsr-corridor/#comment-1804</link>
		<dc:creator>Wad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 23:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetransportpolitic.com/?p=2586#comment-1804</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Tourist corridor with heavy weekend traffic. It’s a bone thrown to Sen. Reid. Don’t see it happening.&lt;/i&gt;

Tourists are traffic, too. The snarkument that it&#039;s a monument to a senator&#039;s ego does not mean such a service will not be used by the public at large.

California is afraid that everybody will be taking the train and dumping their money in Nevada.

Well, there&#039;s also the likely probability that Nevadans might like to visit Southern California&#039;s attractions, particularly the beaches. It&#039;s likely, because it&#039;s a little known fact that Las Vegas is well ... bone-searing unbearably hot.

It&#039;s not like Southern Nevadans say, &quot;Who needs beaches when we could always sneak a swim in the Bellagio fountain?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Tourist corridor with heavy weekend traffic. It’s a bone thrown to Sen. Reid. Don’t see it happening.</i></p>
<p>Tourists are traffic, too. The snarkument that it&#8217;s a monument to a senator&#8217;s ego does not mean such a service will not be used by the public at large.</p>
<p>California is afraid that everybody will be taking the train and dumping their money in Nevada.</p>
<p>Well, there&#8217;s also the likely probability that Nevadans might like to visit Southern California&#8217;s attractions, particularly the beaches. It&#8217;s likely, because it&#8217;s a little known fact that Las Vegas is well &#8230; bone-searing unbearably hot.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not like Southern Nevadans say, &#8220;Who needs beaches when we could always sneak a swim in the Bellagio fountain?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2009/07/02/u-s-dot-to-designate-las-vegas-southern-california-as-hsr-corridor/#comment-1803</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 14:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetransportpolitic.com/?p=2586#comment-1803</guid>
		<description>Tourist corridor with heavy weekend traffic.    It&#039;s a bone thrown to Sen. Reid.   Don&#039;t see it happening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tourist corridor with heavy weekend traffic.    It&#8217;s a bone thrown to Sen. Reid.   Don&#8217;t see it happening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loren Petrich</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2009/07/02/u-s-dot-to-designate-las-vegas-southern-california-as-hsr-corridor/#comment-1801</link>
		<dc:creator>Loren Petrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 11:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetransportpolitic.com/?p=2586#comment-1801</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s great news. It might seem like the Federal Government might stretch itself too thin, but sponsoring HSR projects in several places would be a good way to get support in Congress. If HSR is only a NEC thing, then non-NEC politicians would ask why it would be worth spending Federal money on.

adirondacker12800, Amtrak still runs a train between San Bernardino and Barstow through the Cajon Pass, its Southwest Chief. The distance is 47 miles, and the time is 1h 14m southward and 1h 11m northward - about 39 mph.

The highway distance is less: 35 mi, so a bus could easily beat a train.

It may be possible to build a tunnel there, but there is a certain problem: the San Andreas Fault goes through Cajon Pass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s great news. It might seem like the Federal Government might stretch itself too thin, but sponsoring HSR projects in several places would be a good way to get support in Congress. If HSR is only a NEC thing, then non-NEC politicians would ask why it would be worth spending Federal money on.</p>
<p>adirondacker12800, Amtrak still runs a train between San Bernardino and Barstow through the Cajon Pass, its Southwest Chief. The distance is 47 miles, and the time is 1h 14m southward and 1h 11m northward &#8211; about 39 mph.</p>
<p>The highway distance is less: 35 mi, so a bus could easily beat a train.</p>
<p>It may be possible to build a tunnel there, but there is a certain problem: the San Andreas Fault goes through Cajon Pass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alon Levy</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2009/07/02/u-s-dot-to-designate-las-vegas-southern-california-as-hsr-corridor/#comment-1802</link>
		<dc:creator>Alon Levy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 06:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetransportpolitic.com/?p=2586#comment-1802</guid>
		<description>Adirondacker, it&#039;s going to take considerably less than 30 minutes to get from Palmdale to Victorville. The route is 50 miles of open space, which even slow HSR can do nonstop in 20 minutes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adirondacker, it&#8217;s going to take considerably less than 30 minutes to get from Palmdale to Victorville. The route is 50 miles of open space, which even slow HSR can do nonstop in 20 minutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jarrett at HumanTransit.org</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2009/07/02/u-s-dot-to-designate-las-vegas-southern-california-as-hsr-corridor/#comment-1800</link>
		<dc:creator>Jarrett at HumanTransit.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 03:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetransportpolitic.com/?p=2586#comment-1800</guid>
		<description>Re Maglev, I would only cite the dictum that appears on the right this blog:  Le progrès ne vaut que s&#039;il est partagé par tous.  Progress counts only if everyone shares in its benefits.   It&#039;s a slogan from the French national railway SNCF, as I recall.

Such a dictum could be used to critique any number of transit technologies whose high expense and poor fit with existing urban form means that they will never be any more than boutique services for elite markets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re Maglev, I would only cite the dictum that appears on the right this blog:  Le progrès ne vaut que s&#8217;il est partagé par tous.  Progress counts only if everyone shares in its benefits.   It&#8217;s a slogan from the French national railway SNCF, as I recall.</p>
<p>Such a dictum could be used to critique any number of transit technologies whose high expense and poor fit with existing urban form means that they will never be any more than boutique services for elite markets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paz</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2009/07/02/u-s-dot-to-designate-las-vegas-southern-california-as-hsr-corridor/#comment-1799</link>
		<dc:creator>Paz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 02:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetransportpolitic.com/?p=2586#comment-1799</guid>
		<description>So does this finally mean the death of maglev as a feasible mode of passenger transit?  If so, good riddance. The space-age technology has caused way more hassle than it&#039;s worth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So does this finally mean the death of maglev as a feasible mode of passenger transit?  If so, good riddance. The space-age technology has caused way more hassle than it&#8217;s worth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adirondacker12800</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2009/07/02/u-s-dot-to-designate-las-vegas-southern-california-as-hsr-corridor/#comment-1795</link>
		<dc:creator>adirondacker12800</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 01:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetransportpolitic.com/?p=2586#comment-1795</guid>
		<description>Jarrett, California High Speed Rail site says it will take 59 minutes to get from Riverside to Palmdale. Throw in a half hour to get from Palmdale to Victorville, it&#039;s an hour and half. Another hour and half to get from VIctorville to Las Vegas .... it&#039;s faster than driving.

Alon, I checked old schedules, March 1956. It took forever and ever to get from Victorville to San Bernadino, UP took an hour and 20 minutes or Santa Fe 1:15 on the fastest train....  just as long as it would take HSR to get there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jarrett, California High Speed Rail site says it will take 59 minutes to get from Riverside to Palmdale. Throw in a half hour to get from Palmdale to Victorville, it&#8217;s an hour and half. Another hour and half to get from VIctorville to Las Vegas &#8230;. it&#8217;s faster than driving.</p>
<p>Alon, I checked old schedules, March 1956. It took forever and ever to get from Victorville to San Bernadino, UP took an hour and 20 minutes or Santa Fe 1:15 on the fastest train&#8230;.  just as long as it would take HSR to get there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alon Levy</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2009/07/02/u-s-dot-to-designate-las-vegas-southern-california-as-hsr-corridor/#comment-1798</link>
		<dc:creator>Alon Levy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetransportpolitic.com/?p=2586#comment-1798</guid>
		<description>Jarrett, if they go through Palmdale, then they could run diesel legacy rail-style service from the Inland Empire to Victorville.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jarrett, if they go through Palmdale, then they could run diesel legacy rail-style service from the Inland Empire to Victorville.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
