<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Features on The Transport Politic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2009/09/15/new-features-on-the-transport-politic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2009/09/15/new-features-on-the-transport-politic/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:19:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon256</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2009/09/15/new-features-on-the-transport-politic/#comment-7645</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon256</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 22:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/?p=3947#comment-7645</guid>
		<description>Kyle: Checking bags on an airplane isn&#039;t &quot;mandatory&quot; either, unless your bags contain articles nor permitted in cabin luggage.  Allowing weapons in baggage car checked baggage would pose no more security problems for Amtrak than it does for airlines, and would potentially provide a useful service for customers.

Not that there aren&#039;t far more worthwhile ways our representatives could be trying to improve Amtrak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kyle: Checking bags on an airplane isn&#8217;t &#8220;mandatory&#8221; either, unless your bags contain articles nor permitted in cabin luggage.  Allowing weapons in baggage car checked baggage would pose no more security problems for Amtrak than it does for airlines, and would potentially provide a useful service for customers.</p>
<p>Not that there aren&#8217;t far more worthwhile ways our representatives could be trying to improve Amtrak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2009/09/15/new-features-on-the-transport-politic/#comment-7611</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/?p=3947#comment-7611</guid>
		<description>The only checked baggage on trains is mostly for long distance trains and that is not mandatory.  The vast majority of passengers bring their luggage on the train with them and place them overhead or at the end of each car in the luggage rack.

So, bags on a train are easily accessible, while aircraft checked bags are not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only checked baggage on trains is mostly for long distance trains and that is not mandatory.  The vast majority of passengers bring their luggage on the train with them and place them overhead or at the end of each car in the luggage rack.</p>
<p>So, bags on a train are easily accessible, while aircraft checked bags are not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yonah Freemark</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2009/09/15/new-features-on-the-transport-politic/#comment-7538</link>
		<dc:creator>Yonah Freemark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/?p=3947#comment-7538</guid>
		<description>For now... Keeping an international database up to date would take too much time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For now&#8230; Keeping an international database up to date would take too much time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trainsintokyo</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2009/09/15/new-features-on-the-transport-politic/#comment-7492</link>
		<dc:creator>trainsintokyo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 01:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/?p=3947#comment-7492</guid>
		<description>Yonah, I assume you want to limit the Planned Transit and Under Construction sections to North American projects, correct?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yonah, I assume you want to limit the Planned Transit and Under Construction sections to North American projects, correct?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aw</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2009/09/15/new-features-on-the-transport-politic/#comment-7486</link>
		<dc:creator>aw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 01:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/?p=3947#comment-7486</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t checked baggage stay in the baggage car?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t checked baggage stay in the baggage car?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2009/09/15/new-features-on-the-transport-politic/#comment-7480</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/?p=3947#comment-7480</guid>
		<description>But you can&#039;t go and get your gun from your bag on an airplane- you can on a train. BIG DIFFERENCE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But you can&#8217;t go and get your gun from your bag on an airplane- you can on a train. BIG DIFFERENCE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EngineerScotty</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2009/09/15/new-features-on-the-transport-politic/#comment-7440</link>
		<dc:creator>EngineerScotty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/?p=3947#comment-7440</guid>
		<description>Given that you can check firearms onto an aircraft, why would a train be any different?  Not that I much care about the Senator&#039;s specific concern, but the prospect of someone hijacking a train is a lot less dangerous to national security than a hijacked airplane.

If one is worried about passenger safety and the prospect of terrorists targeting HSR, it is worthwhile to remember that mass transit is probably far more at risk.  Numerous terrorist attacks around the world have attacked subway systems in recent years, and consider the case of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daegu_subway_fire&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Daegu subway fire&lt;/a&gt;, wherein a mentally ill person killed almost 200 people by setting a carton of flammable liquid ablaze.

(Interestingly enough, many of the safety measures in place exacerbated the incindent, when a second train entered the station on the next track, could not leave when the power supply was shut off, and was engulfed as well).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given that you can check firearms onto an aircraft, why would a train be any different?  Not that I much care about the Senator&#8217;s specific concern, but the prospect of someone hijacking a train is a lot less dangerous to national security than a hijacked airplane.</p>
<p>If one is worried about passenger safety and the prospect of terrorists targeting HSR, it is worthwhile to remember that mass transit is probably far more at risk.  Numerous terrorist attacks around the world have attacked subway systems in recent years, and consider the case of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daegu_subway_fire" rel="nofollow">Daegu subway fire</a>, wherein a mentally ill person killed almost 200 people by setting a carton of flammable liquid ablaze.</p>
<p>(Interestingly enough, many of the safety measures in place exacerbated the incindent, when a second train entered the station on the next track, could not leave when the power supply was shut off, and was engulfed as well).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alon Levy</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2009/09/15/new-features-on-the-transport-politic/#comment-7434</link>
		<dc:creator>Alon Levy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/?p=3947#comment-7434</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Check out a full list of the transit projects that McCain aims to strike this week.

* the ARC transit tunnel connecting New York City and New Jersey&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I wish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Check out a full list of the transit projects that McCain aims to strike this week.</p>
<p>* the ARC transit tunnel connecting New York City and New Jersey</p></blockquote>
<p>I wish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

