<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New York Regional Rail: A Coda</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/03/10/new-york-regional-rail-a-coda/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/03/10/new-york-regional-rail-a-coda/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 07:02:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transportation planner in LI</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/03/10/new-york-regional-rail-a-coda/#comment-50535</link>
		<dc:creator>Transportation planner in LI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 19:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/?p=6140#comment-50535</guid>
		<description>Realistically, the item that can be made possible now is a single ticket for use on all three systems. That alone would made suburb-to-suburb travel much easier. 

Coo-Coo text service (provides schedule info for the LIRR) is starting to provide cross-carrier scheduling soon, simply by sending a text message &quot;merrick to suffern&quot;, would give you detailed information about the next few departures + details about the transfer times.


It is my view however, that the FRA has dropped the ball with the Northeast. There should be a mandated standard for all rolling stock - YES, the Pennsylvania RR, Central RR and Long Island RR all did compete, this has not been the case for many years. It seems that the MTA and NJT kept on the former employees of the RR&#039;s and their corporate culture. This needs to be eliminated.

At this point, we need to slowly wein off 3rd Rail use on LIRR and MNRR, by requiring all new car to have dual systems: 3rd rail AND ac canternary.

Which regard to through service at penn, it is obvious that not every train would continue through, only some. However, there are many trips made from JFK to EWR that would now be made easily from Jamaica to Newark Airport Station. 

The removal of an entire industry that take advantage of this lack of through service (taxi from EWR to Queens, JFK to Bergen, ect.) would mean the loss of many jobs in the Region!

Finally, it the transfer experience that really makes the cake. Thousands of people transfer at Jamaica everyday, because the signs are clear, the trains are scheduled to arrive at the same time and it is a single ticket.

 (NJT does a terrible job at this at Secaucus, it is common that trains going to NYP do not wait for a Hoboken Bound train with a scheduled transfer.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Realistically, the item that can be made possible now is a single ticket for use on all three systems. That alone would made suburb-to-suburb travel much easier. </p>
<p>Coo-Coo text service (provides schedule info for the LIRR) is starting to provide cross-carrier scheduling soon, simply by sending a text message &#8220;merrick to suffern&#8221;, would give you detailed information about the next few departures + details about the transfer times.</p>
<p>It is my view however, that the FRA has dropped the ball with the Northeast. There should be a mandated standard for all rolling stock &#8211; YES, the Pennsylvania RR, Central RR and Long Island RR all did compete, this has not been the case for many years. It seems that the MTA and NJT kept on the former employees of the RR&#8217;s and their corporate culture. This needs to be eliminated.</p>
<p>At this point, we need to slowly wein off 3rd Rail use on LIRR and MNRR, by requiring all new car to have dual systems: 3rd rail AND ac canternary.</p>
<p>Which regard to through service at penn, it is obvious that not every train would continue through, only some. However, there are many trips made from JFK to EWR that would now be made easily from Jamaica to Newark Airport Station. </p>
<p>The removal of an entire industry that take advantage of this lack of through service (taxi from EWR to Queens, JFK to Bergen, ect.) would mean the loss of many jobs in the Region!</p>
<p>Finally, it the transfer experience that really makes the cake. Thousands of people transfer at Jamaica everyday, because the signs are clear, the trains are scheduled to arrive at the same time and it is a single ticket.</p>
<p> (NJT does a terrible job at this at Secaucus, it is common that trains going to NYP do not wait for a Hoboken Bound train with a scheduled transfer.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alon Levy</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/03/10/new-york-regional-rail-a-coda/#comment-47074</link>
		<dc:creator>Alon Levy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 03:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/?p=6140#comment-47074</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;It is 600,000 a day, on the railroads alone. The subway fares don’t count.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The LIRR and new Jersey Transit together don&#039;t have 600,000 riders a weekday. And only about half their riders go to Penn Station, and half of those exit rather than enter. NJT used to provide information about how many boardings it had at its busiest stations; Penn had 67,000 per weekday. The only way you can get to 600,000 from that is if you include entries and exits on both systems plus the subway.

It would take five minutes to check that Copenhagen has 24/7 service, that Seoul has dedicated express tracks on one of its lines and so do many of Tokyo&#039;s commuter lines, and that while New York may have twice as many subway cars as Tokyo, it only gets half the ridership. Yay, efficiency. If ignoring all that makes you a real New Yorker, maybe New York needs to be governed by outsiders for a change.

Go work as a Wal-Mart greeter or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It is 600,000 a day, on the railroads alone. The subway fares don’t count.</p></blockquote>
<p>The LIRR and new Jersey Transit together don&#8217;t have 600,000 riders a weekday. And only about half their riders go to Penn Station, and half of those exit rather than enter. NJT used to provide information about how many boardings it had at its busiest stations; Penn had 67,000 per weekday. The only way you can get to 600,000 from that is if you include entries and exits on both systems plus the subway.</p>
<p>It would take five minutes to check that Copenhagen has 24/7 service, that Seoul has dedicated express tracks on one of its lines and so do many of Tokyo&#8217;s commuter lines, and that while New York may have twice as many subway cars as Tokyo, it only gets half the ridership. Yay, efficiency. If ignoring all that makes you a real New Yorker, maybe New York needs to be governed by outsiders for a change.</p>
<p>Go work as a Wal-Mart greeter or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Metropod</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/03/10/new-york-regional-rail-a-coda/#comment-47069</link>
		<dc:creator>Metropod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 02:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/?p=6140#comment-47069</guid>
		<description>It is 600,000 a day, on the railroads alone. The subway fares don&#039;t count.

 You&#039;ve just proven you don&#039;t know what you are talking about.

You&#039;re not a New Yorker. You&#039;re not one of us. you&#039;ll never be one of us, you&#039;ll never understand. All the booksmarts in the world will get you no where in this town. You can&#039;t stand there and say &quot;well, it works there, it&#039;ll work here,&quot; because this is America and that doesn&#039;t happen here. We don&#039;t want to be like everyone else. we don&#039;t want copy the idiot europeans who are currently dranging down our econimic recovery, becuase the euro finally has come back to bite them in the butt.

We have the largest rapid transit system in the world by track miles. We have the largest number of stations. We hae the largest fleet of subway cars. We have the only system in the world that is open in it&#039;s entirety all day every day. We have the only system that offeres all day every day express service on dedicated express tracks. 

If anything, they should be the ones copying us!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is 600,000 a day, on the railroads alone. The subway fares don&#8217;t count.</p>
<p> You&#8217;ve just proven you don&#8217;t know what you are talking about.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re not a New Yorker. You&#8217;re not one of us. you&#8217;ll never be one of us, you&#8217;ll never understand. All the booksmarts in the world will get you no where in this town. You can&#8217;t stand there and say &#8220;well, it works there, it&#8217;ll work here,&#8221; because this is America and that doesn&#8217;t happen here. We don&#8217;t want to be like everyone else. we don&#8217;t want copy the idiot europeans who are currently dranging down our econimic recovery, becuase the euro finally has come back to bite them in the butt.</p>
<p>We have the largest rapid transit system in the world by track miles. We have the largest number of stations. We hae the largest fleet of subway cars. We have the only system in the world that is open in it&#8217;s entirety all day every day. We have the only system that offeres all day every day express service on dedicated express tracks. </p>
<p>If anything, they should be the ones copying us!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curt Sampson</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/03/10/new-york-regional-rail-a-coda/#comment-45768</link>
		<dc:creator>Curt Sampson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 13:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/?p=6140#comment-45768</guid>
		<description>Note that Tokyo has what might seem like an even worse situation for interoperation: just in Tokyo itself we have two subway companies, the national rail operator, and at least eight different private rail operators. (There are also several different companies running buses.)

As one example of interoperation, on the Den-en-toshi line, owned by Tokyu, trains run from Den-en-toshi in Kanagawa prefecture (a prefecture here is like a state in the US) to Shibuya in the Tokyo prefecture, continue on the Hanzomon subway line owned by the private Tokyo Metro corporation to Oshiage where it is now on the Isesaki line, owned by Tobu, continuing on through the Saitama prefecture into the Gunma prefecture. You can get in a train car at one end and come out two hours later at the other end a hundred kilometers and four prefectures away. You&#039;re charged your twelve bucks for this via one swipe of a contactless smart card going in and another going out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note that Tokyo has what might seem like an even worse situation for interoperation: just in Tokyo itself we have two subway companies, the national rail operator, and at least eight different private rail operators. (There are also several different companies running buses.)</p>
<p>As one example of interoperation, on the Den-en-toshi line, owned by Tokyu, trains run from Den-en-toshi in Kanagawa prefecture (a prefecture here is like a state in the US) to Shibuya in the Tokyo prefecture, continue on the Hanzomon subway line owned by the private Tokyo Metro corporation to Oshiage where it is now on the Isesaki line, owned by Tobu, continuing on through the Saitama prefecture into the Gunma prefecture. You can get in a train car at one end and come out two hours later at the other end a hundred kilometers and four prefectures away. You&#8217;re charged your twelve bucks for this via one swipe of a contactless smart card going in and another going out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alon Levy</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/03/10/new-york-regional-rail-a-coda/#comment-37528</link>
		<dc:creator>Alon Levy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 23:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/?p=6140#comment-37528</guid>
		<description>Tim, in both Paris and Berlin the system has multiple operators. The RER is owned half by RATP and half by SNCF; the RER B is owned by both, with a quick change of drivers at Gare du Nord. The Berlin S-Bahn is run by DB, whereas the U-Bahn is run by a local transit agency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim, in both Paris and Berlin the system has multiple operators. The RER is owned half by RATP and half by SNCF; the RER B is owned by both, with a quick change of drivers at Gare du Nord. The Berlin S-Bahn is run by DB, whereas the U-Bahn is run by a local transit agency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/03/10/new-york-regional-rail-a-coda/#comment-37466</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 15:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/?p=6140#comment-37466</guid>
		<description>Ted,

Most of the infrastructure was inherited from failed private companies.  Penn and GCT are named for the railroads that once occupied them.  GCT exists where it is as laws forbade operation of steam trains south fo 42nd.  Its footprint has been the same for 130+ years at this point (I know it&#039;s been rebuilt since).  Creating a connection between the two ran contrary to the business interests of the corporations who developed the structures.

As for Queens, well, *insert Robert Moses thoughts here*.  In all seriousness though, Moses did a lot to squash transit expansion plans, and aside from the initial boom in transit construction in the first half of the 20th century, there hasn&#039;t been a really renewed focus on intensive transit capital growth until recently.  With the developmento f the interstate system, all eyes were on cars, and most of the money went that way.

Creating a unified through-running system will be nigh impossible, given the multiple state-level government agencies in multiple states with differing political needs and customer bases.  I&#039;d love to have a large, unified system like Paris or Berlin, where one fare gets you access to the system and transfers, but getting the MTA, NJT, and PANYNJ all on the same page would be a nightmare, and probably require federal intervention, which might get shot down in the court system.  Just look at the WTC.  9 years later, and the only thing that&#039;s been rebuilt is the only privately owned tower in the complex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ted,</p>
<p>Most of the infrastructure was inherited from failed private companies.  Penn and GCT are named for the railroads that once occupied them.  GCT exists where it is as laws forbade operation of steam trains south fo 42nd.  Its footprint has been the same for 130+ years at this point (I know it&#8217;s been rebuilt since).  Creating a connection between the two ran contrary to the business interests of the corporations who developed the structures.</p>
<p>As for Queens, well, *insert Robert Moses thoughts here*.  In all seriousness though, Moses did a lot to squash transit expansion plans, and aside from the initial boom in transit construction in the first half of the 20th century, there hasn&#8217;t been a really renewed focus on intensive transit capital growth until recently.  With the developmento f the interstate system, all eyes were on cars, and most of the money went that way.</p>
<p>Creating a unified through-running system will be nigh impossible, given the multiple state-level government agencies in multiple states with differing political needs and customer bases.  I&#8217;d love to have a large, unified system like Paris or Berlin, where one fare gets you access to the system and transfers, but getting the MTA, NJT, and PANYNJ all on the same page would be a nightmare, and probably require federal intervention, which might get shot down in the court system.  Just look at the WTC.  9 years later, and the only thing that&#8217;s been rebuilt is the only privately owned tower in the complex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/03/10/new-york-regional-rail-a-coda/#comment-37456</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/?p=6140#comment-37456</guid>
		<description>Alon,


Thought you might get a kick out of this.  Video of an NJT test run on the MNR tracks at Larchmont, NY, with a double-decker electric train set.

Enjoy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wDfcy_PBEs0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alon,</p>
<p>Thought you might get a kick out of this.  Video of an NJT test run on the MNR tracks at Larchmont, NY, with a double-decker electric train set.</p>
<p>Enjoy.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wDfcy_PBEs0" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wDfcy_PBEs0</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Elliss</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/03/10/new-york-regional-rail-a-coda/#comment-35455</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Elliss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 23:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/?p=6140#comment-35455</guid>
		<description>I have studied NYC mtro&#039;s transit development for decades, and I&#039;m sorry to say it is a fractured and further-damaging array of systems which do not all work together for connective convenience for both the commuter and tourist alike. Grand Central and Penn Stations should have been built directly across from one another- and with through tracks for direct service between Long Island/upstate NY/CT and New Jersey. The former World Trade Center (now Fulton St. Terminal) should be a destination for commuter rail lines from Long Island and New Jersey (and what were they thinking when creating the LIRR Flatbush Ave.- Brooklyn terminal- when they could&#039;ve extended the tracks through new stations at Borough Hall and into lower Manhattan? What an nightmarish and costly task for one to have to transfer to buses and subways; and to top that off- the terminal is over two miles from downtown Brooklyn. Look at Queens...why do subway/elevated lines go no further than Jamaica? The population densities in eastern and southeastern outreaches of the borough easily support rapid rail service. The LIRR has been the mostly unreliable source of rail service to these areas, as stations are served infrequently- and on higher fare levels than MTA buses.
In The Bronx, the subway that terminates south of Orchard Beach could easily reach Co-op City- and even branch off toward the area near Whitestone Bridge. In Brooklyn, existing subway lines should extend to lower Canarsie, along Flatbush Ave. to Avenue U, and extend the A Line branch into southeastern Queens and Kennedy Airport. By the way, I am always amusingly disgusted at how both Second and Tenth Avenues, and Greenwich Village do not have subway lines. As for Richmond/Staten Island, I find that its sole rail line is underused, and somewhat unpopular. There is a study now happening to install rail service along the north shore of S.I.- a costly mistake. However, I truly believe that PATH could be extended into S.I. via the Bayonne Bridge from NJ as a supplement to its existing Hudson-Bergin Light-Rail line, with new stations along a north/south central corridor- then branching off between Tottenvile to the west, and the ferry terminal/St. George to the northeast. This would offer a wonderful and fast option for Manhattan and Jersey City/Newark-bound commuters...if officials could see development for this as worthwhile. Finally, crosstown subways or light-rail routes would likely be highly utilized between east-west Bronx via Fordham Rd., between east-west Brooklyn via either Avenue U or Kings Highway, and north-south between LaGuardia Airport and Rockaway Beach/Far Rockaway via Woodhaven Blvd. (which could replace the A Line subway branch partially or completely). The bus system? Don&#039;t get me started!!!
new lines would prove quite feasible as crosstowns</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have studied NYC mtro&#8217;s transit development for decades, and I&#8217;m sorry to say it is a fractured and further-damaging array of systems which do not all work together for connective convenience for both the commuter and tourist alike. Grand Central and Penn Stations should have been built directly across from one another- and with through tracks for direct service between Long Island/upstate NY/CT and New Jersey. The former World Trade Center (now Fulton St. Terminal) should be a destination for commuter rail lines from Long Island and New Jersey (and what were they thinking when creating the LIRR Flatbush Ave.- Brooklyn terminal- when they could&#8217;ve extended the tracks through new stations at Borough Hall and into lower Manhattan? What an nightmarish and costly task for one to have to transfer to buses and subways; and to top that off- the terminal is over two miles from downtown Brooklyn. Look at Queens&#8230;why do subway/elevated lines go no further than Jamaica? The population densities in eastern and southeastern outreaches of the borough easily support rapid rail service. The LIRR has been the mostly unreliable source of rail service to these areas, as stations are served infrequently- and on higher fare levels than MTA buses.<br />
In The Bronx, the subway that terminates south of Orchard Beach could easily reach Co-op City- and even branch off toward the area near Whitestone Bridge. In Brooklyn, existing subway lines should extend to lower Canarsie, along Flatbush Ave. to Avenue U, and extend the A Line branch into southeastern Queens and Kennedy Airport. By the way, I am always amusingly disgusted at how both Second and Tenth Avenues, and Greenwich Village do not have subway lines. As for Richmond/Staten Island, I find that its sole rail line is underused, and somewhat unpopular. There is a study now happening to install rail service along the north shore of S.I.- a costly mistake. However, I truly believe that PATH could be extended into S.I. via the Bayonne Bridge from NJ as a supplement to its existing Hudson-Bergin Light-Rail line, with new stations along a north/south central corridor- then branching off between Tottenvile to the west, and the ferry terminal/St. George to the northeast. This would offer a wonderful and fast option for Manhattan and Jersey City/Newark-bound commuters&#8230;if officials could see development for this as worthwhile. Finally, crosstown subways or light-rail routes would likely be highly utilized between east-west Bronx via Fordham Rd., between east-west Brooklyn via either Avenue U or Kings Highway, and north-south between LaGuardia Airport and Rockaway Beach/Far Rockaway via Woodhaven Blvd. (which could replace the A Line subway branch partially or completely). The bus system? Don&#8217;t get me started!!!<br />
new lines would prove quite feasible as crosstowns</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Brassard</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/03/10/new-york-regional-rail-a-coda/#comment-34141</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Brassard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/?p=6140#comment-34141</guid>
		<description>Another major transfer station could be located at 149th Street in the Bronx. 149th Street is the location where Metro North’s Harlem and New Haven lines split. This would allow for easier transfers between Connecticut and Westchester cities and suburbs. A 149th Street Station would be near Yankee Stadium, the Grand Concourse and The Hub in the South Bronx. Platforms could be located just north of the split and connected by a station mezzanine above the tracks on the north side of the 149th Street Bridge. Subway lines are nearby and a direct connection could be made to the 149th Street-Grand Concourse Station, 2, 4, and 5 trains linked by a tunnel to new Metro North platforms a few hundred feet away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another major transfer station could be located at 149th Street in the Bronx. 149th Street is the location where Metro North’s Harlem and New Haven lines split. This would allow for easier transfers between Connecticut and Westchester cities and suburbs. A 149th Street Station would be near Yankee Stadium, the Grand Concourse and The Hub in the South Bronx. Platforms could be located just north of the split and connected by a station mezzanine above the tracks on the north side of the 149th Street Bridge. Subway lines are nearby and a direct connection could be made to the 149th Street-Grand Concourse Station, 2, 4, and 5 trains linked by a tunnel to new Metro North platforms a few hundred feet away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexB</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/03/10/new-york-regional-rail-a-coda/#comment-34134</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/?p=6140#comment-34134</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t doubt that a tunnel along the length of Manhattan and the Harbor would be the highest capacity &amp; fastest solution, I just doubt the SIRR will ever have that many riders.  Maybe I&#039;m cynical, or maybe you guys are optimistic.  No way to really know without a multi-million dollar study.  

It really boils down to this: You have to upgrade all the SIRR stations and build a brand new subway station at St George regardless of the solution, so those are sunk costs of any connection of the SIRR to anything.  The only difference is whether you want to upgrade the current situation from a 60 minute ± commute to a 30 minute ± commute via the N for $2.5 billion ± with max capacity 15 tph or to a 15/20 minute commute for $5 billion ± with maximum capacity of 30 tph.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t doubt that a tunnel along the length of Manhattan and the Harbor would be the highest capacity &amp; fastest solution, I just doubt the SIRR will ever have that many riders.  Maybe I&#8217;m cynical, or maybe you guys are optimistic.  No way to really know without a multi-million dollar study.  </p>
<p>It really boils down to this: You have to upgrade all the SIRR stations and build a brand new subway station at St George regardless of the solution, so those are sunk costs of any connection of the SIRR to anything.  The only difference is whether you want to upgrade the current situation from a 60 minute ± commute to a 30 minute ± commute via the N for $2.5 billion ± with max capacity 15 tph or to a 15/20 minute commute for $5 billion ± with maximum capacity of 30 tph.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
