<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Decade&#8217;s Top Hits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/03/11/the-decades-top-hits-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/03/11/the-decades-top-hits-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 06:40:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Alexander</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/03/11/the-decades-top-hits-2/#comment-33118</link>
		<dc:creator>David Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/?p=6283#comment-33118</guid>
		<description>The same is also true of HBLR. IIRC, both projects underwent the the DBOM process primarily to speed up their funding and thus expedite the construction of the line, hence why HBLR went from MOS-1 to MOS-2 within six years of operation. I believe NJT essentially borrowed against future monies placed into the Transportation Trust Fund which is used by the state of New Jersey to pay for varying transport projects.

BTW, according to the &lt;a&gt;FTA&lt;/a&gt;, the as-built capital costs for MOS I was $869.7M and MOS II was $886.5M.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The same is also true of HBLR. IIRC, both projects underwent the the DBOM process primarily to speed up their funding and thus expedite the construction of the line, hence why HBLR went from MOS-1 to MOS-2 within six years of operation. I believe NJT essentially borrowed against future monies placed into the Transportation Trust Fund which is used by the state of New Jersey to pay for varying transport projects.</p>
<p>BTW, according to the <a>FTA</a>, the as-built capital costs for MOS I was $869.7M and MOS II was $886.5M.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Krom</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/03/11/the-decades-top-hits-2/#comment-33109</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Krom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 18:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/?p=6283#comment-33109</guid>
		<description>I believe that the River Line was a DBOM project — design build operate maintain. I think that roughly ten years of operating expenses were capitalized into the project cost. If that is true, then you would need to back those costs out to compare to projects where operating costs are not included in the cost estimate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that the River Line was a DBOM project — design build operate maintain. I think that roughly ten years of operating expenses were capitalized into the project cost. If that is true, then you would need to back those costs out to compare to projects where operating costs are not included in the cost estimate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathanael</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/03/11/the-decades-top-hits-2/#comment-32971</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathanael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/?p=6283#comment-32971</guid>
		<description>The Silver Lie dug bus tunnels in very difficult areas, with lots of underpinning, waterproofing, avoiding existing foundations, etc.

And it was basically a big waste.  :-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Silver Lie dug bus tunnels in very difficult areas, with lots of underpinning, waterproofing, avoiding existing foundations, etc.</p>
<p>And it was basically a big waste.  :-(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BruceMcF</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/03/11/the-decades-top-hits-2/#comment-32865</link>
		<dc:creator>BruceMcF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 00:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/?p=6283#comment-32865</guid>
		<description>It makes a big difference if you look at lump sum capital cost versus annualized capital cost. Lump sum deflates the economic cost of less durable infrastructure and inflates the capital cost of more durable infrastructure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It makes a big difference if you look at lump sum capital cost versus annualized capital cost. Lump sum deflates the economic cost of less durable infrastructure and inflates the capital cost of more durable infrastructure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandi</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/03/11/the-decades-top-hits-2/#comment-32833</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/?p=6283#comment-32833</guid>
		<description>Wow didn&#039;t know Yonah did the graphics for the infrastructurist too.  Talk about a graphic god!  This decade did seem to have a few good hits, let&#039;s hope for a lot more next decade!  Also how did the Boston Silver Line cost so much?  I thought that wasn&#039;t even real BRT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow didn&#8217;t know Yonah did the graphics for the infrastructurist too.  Talk about a graphic god!  This decade did seem to have a few good hits, let&#8217;s hope for a lot more next decade!  Also how did the Boston Silver Line cost so much?  I thought that wasn&#8217;t even real BRT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/03/11/the-decades-top-hits-2/#comment-32776</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 04:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/?p=6283#comment-32776</guid>
		<description>Well, now, THAT was a public service announcement if I ever saw one! Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, now, THAT was a public service announcement if I ever saw one! Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted King</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/03/11/the-decades-top-hits-2/#comment-32758</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/?p=6283#comment-32758</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/10-Most-Expensive-Projects-of-the-2000s.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Lead graphic (FULL SIZE)&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/10-Most-Expensive-Projects-of-the-2000s.jpg" rel="nofollow">Lead graphic (FULL SIZE)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chetan</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/03/11/the-decades-top-hits-2/#comment-32756</link>
		<dc:creator>Chetan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/?p=6283#comment-32756</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not a matter of &quot;if&quot; any more, just a matter of when. We will have a move transit oriented America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not a matter of &#8220;if&#8221; any more, just a matter of when. We will have a move transit oriented America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelsey</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/03/11/the-decades-top-hits-2/#comment-32744</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/?p=6283#comment-32744</guid>
		<description>Do you have an estimate for the total amount of planned light rail projects in the US?  I saw the list but a bunch don&#039;t have numbers on them and I&#039;m trying to get a feel for the size of the &quot;proposed&quot; market... thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you have an estimate for the total amount of planned light rail projects in the US?  I saw the list but a bunch don&#8217;t have numbers on them and I&#8217;m trying to get a feel for the size of the &#8220;proposed&#8221; market&#8230; thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DBX</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/03/11/the-decades-top-hits-2/#comment-32720</link>
		<dc:creator>DBX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/?p=6283#comment-32720</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re missing Chicago&#039;s Douglas/54th-Cermak Blue Line reconstruction -- a far more thorough project than the recent Brown Line scheme -- which took place from 2002 to 2005.  

However, even with this included in Chicago transit, the sad fact is that it does not even get Chicago, the third largest metropolitan area in the country, into the top ten list for total investment.  Which says something about the pitiable state of things here in Illinois, where no-one is even talking about a balanced budget even though we&#039;re constitutionally required to have one, and where the latest infrastructure plan is more skewed towards roads than the last one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re missing Chicago&#8217;s Douglas/54th-Cermak Blue Line reconstruction &#8212; a far more thorough project than the recent Brown Line scheme &#8212; which took place from 2002 to 2005.  </p>
<p>However, even with this included in Chicago transit, the sad fact is that it does not even get Chicago, the third largest metropolitan area in the country, into the top ten list for total investment.  Which says something about the pitiable state of things here in Illinois, where no-one is even talking about a balanced budget even though we&#8217;re constitutionally required to have one, and where the latest infrastructure plan is more skewed towards roads than the last one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
