<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Readying Streetcar Plans, Cincinnati Considers Reducing Parking Requirements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/06/21/readying-streetcar-plans-cincinnati-considers-reducing-parking-requirements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/06/21/readying-streetcar-plans-cincinnati-considers-reducing-parking-requirements/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:43:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FG</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/06/21/readying-streetcar-plans-cincinnati-considers-reducing-parking-requirements/#comment-51053</link>
		<dc:creator>FG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 20:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/?p=7358#comment-51053</guid>
		<description>But few developers use this. And community groups (aka Nimby&#039;s) often object to any reduction in parking - usually successfully.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But few developers use this. And community groups (aka Nimby&#8217;s) often object to any reduction in parking &#8211; usually successfully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laldm</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/06/21/readying-streetcar-plans-cincinnati-considers-reducing-parking-requirements/#comment-50975</link>
		<dc:creator>laldm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 03:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/?p=7358#comment-50975</guid>
		<description>This seems like quite a forward-thinking policy. Chicago has a similar policy for its L system, but the distance is the same - 600 feet. In that case, the distance should be a lot larger, but in the case of a streetcar, which is not likely to be used as much as a rapid transit system (it is, after all, in essence, a really nice bus), this seems to make sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems like quite a forward-thinking policy. Chicago has a similar policy for its L system, but the distance is the same &#8211; 600 feet. In that case, the distance should be a lot larger, but in the case of a streetcar, which is not likely to be used as much as a rapid transit system (it is, after all, in essence, a really nice bus), this seems to make sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A che servono i parcheggi se abitate vicino al tram? &#124; Nuova Mobilità</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/06/21/readying-streetcar-plans-cincinnati-considers-reducing-parking-requirements/#comment-50247</link>
		<dc:creator>A che servono i parcheggi se abitate vicino al tram? &#124; Nuova Mobilità</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 10:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/?p=7358#comment-50247</guid>
		<description>[...] orginiale: Readying Streetcar Plans, Cincinnati Considers Reducing Parking Requirements  48.842228 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] orginiale: Readying Streetcar Plans, Cincinnati Considers Reducing Parking Requirements  48.842228 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Bridgman</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/06/21/readying-streetcar-plans-cincinnati-considers-reducing-parking-requirements/#comment-50070</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Bridgman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 04:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/?p=7358#comment-50070</guid>
		<description>Good job to Cincinnati on making policy decisions to support the use of transit!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good job to Cincinnati on making policy decisions to support the use of transit!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/06/21/readying-streetcar-plans-cincinnati-considers-reducing-parking-requirements/#comment-49935</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 03:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/?p=7358#comment-49935</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s an awfully short distance, and I wonder what it was based on.  Normally a 5-minute walk, or roughly 350 to 400 metres, would be considered a typical catchment area for a surface transit stop.  The Cincinnati standard is barely half that.  Even worse, the area to which the reduced parking permissions would apply is less than 1/3 of what it could be with a 5-minute radius (12.5 vs. 41 hectares).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s an awfully short distance, and I wonder what it was based on.  Normally a 5-minute walk, or roughly 350 to 400 metres, would be considered a typical catchment area for a surface transit stop.  The Cincinnati standard is barely half that.  Even worse, the area to which the reduced parking permissions would apply is less than 1/3 of what it could be with a 5-minute radius (12.5 vs. 41 hectares).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W. K. Lis</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/06/21/readying-streetcar-plans-cincinnati-considers-reducing-parking-requirements/#comment-49805</link>
		<dc:creator>W. K. Lis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 21:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/?p=7358#comment-49805</guid>
		<description>1. Streetcars should run until AFTER the bars close.

2. Bars should not provide parking for their patrons, let them take public transit home. Else it would be encouraging drinking and driving, by providing parking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Streetcars should run until AFTER the bars close.</p>
<p>2. Bars should not provide parking for their patrons, let them take public transit home. Else it would be encouraging drinking and driving, by providing parking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yonah Freemark</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/06/21/readying-streetcar-plans-cincinnati-considers-reducing-parking-requirements/#comment-49800</link>
		<dc:creator>Yonah Freemark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 21:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/?p=7358#comment-49800</guid>
		<description>Haha, I was going to delete it, but you guys made it worth keeping...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, I was going to delete it, but you guys made it worth keeping&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M1EK</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/06/21/readying-streetcar-plans-cincinnati-considers-reducing-parking-requirements/#comment-49799</link>
		<dc:creator>M1EK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 20:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/?p=7358#comment-49799</guid>
		<description>Are they giving their streetcars their own lane? If not, the quality of the service is objectively inferior to buses, and even less likely to attract riders in the long-term. Jarrett&#039;s long series on streetcars and mobility can&#039;t have been forgotten this quickly...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are they giving their streetcars their own lane? If not, the quality of the service is objectively inferior to buses, and even less likely to attract riders in the long-term. Jarrett&#8217;s long series on streetcars and mobility can&#8217;t have been forgotten this quickly&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EngineerScotty</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/06/21/readying-streetcar-plans-cincinnati-considers-reducing-parking-requirements/#comment-49798</link>
		<dc:creator>EngineerScotty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 20:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/?p=7358#comment-49798</guid>
		<description>As spam goes, this one&#039;s pretty incompetent.  No links to drive up search engine rankings, on a website where nobody is likely to care.  After all, this is a transit site, so we prefer cruise ships (the streetcars of the sea) to SOBs.  (Single-occupancy boats--whad did you think?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As spam goes, this one&#8217;s pretty incompetent.  No links to drive up search engine rankings, on a website where nobody is likely to care.  After all, this is a transit site, so we prefer cruise ships (the streetcars of the sea) to SOBs.  (Single-occupancy boats&#8211;whad did you think?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/06/21/readying-streetcar-plans-cincinnati-considers-reducing-parking-requirements/#comment-49794</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 20:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/?p=7358#comment-49794</guid>
		<description>Nice spam! And thanks for the tip. As it happens I do have one of my yachts based in Pensacola, and I have to get it out of there soon, or paint it black, if you get my drift. I&#039;ll be in touch Yacht Exports a.s.a.p.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice spam! And thanks for the tip. As it happens I do have one of my yachts based in Pensacola, and I have to get it out of there soon, or paint it black, if you get my drift. I&#8217;ll be in touch Yacht Exports a.s.a.p.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

