<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Transport Politic &#187; Beijing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/category/places-in-asia-and-australia/beijing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 05:32:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Beijing-Shanghai HSR Link to Average Speeds of Over 200 mph</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2009/06/25/beijing-shanghai-hsr-link-to-average-speeds-of-over-200-mph/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2009/06/25/beijing-shanghai-hsr-link-to-average-speeds-of-over-200-mph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 08:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yonah Freemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beijing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High-Speed Rail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shanghai]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetransportpolitic.com/?p=2512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Railway Ministry announces trip will take less than four hours, versus previously announced five.</p>
<p>China&#8217;s Beijing-Shanghai high-speed connection, which is the most important link in the country&#8217;s ambitious rail plans, will be faster than previously announced when it fully opens in 2013. The project was designed from the start for trains capable of 217 mph top speeds, but the government estimated total trip time of five hours on the 819 mile corridor, which would have meant average speeds of 164 mph on the whole line, a bit above typical for a corridor of this type. The country has now announced that its <p><a href="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2009/06/25/beijing-shanghai-hsr-link-to-average-speeds-of-over-200-mph/">Continue reading this post »</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Railway Ministry announces trip will take less than four hours, versus previously announced five.</strong></p>
<p>China&#8217;s Beijing-Shanghai high-speed connection, which is the most important link in the country&#8217;s <a href="http://thetransportpolitic.com/2009/01/12/high-speed-rail-in-china/">ambitious rail plans</a>, will be faster than previously announced when it fully opens in 2013. The project was designed from the start for trains capable of 217 mph top speeds, but the government estimated total trip time of five hours on the 819 mile corridor, which would have meant average speeds of 164 mph on the whole line, <a href="http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/04/06/chart-comparing-new-hs-projects-around-the-world/">a bit above typical</a> for a corridor of this type. The country has <a href="http://www.cctv.com/program/bizchina/20090625/103766.shtml">now announced</a> that its ambitions are even larger, and that trains will <em>average</em> over 200 mph to make the trip in less than four hours.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s significant about this announcement is that it means that trains will be moving at speeds higher than the 217 mph initially proposed for the major parts of the trip, making this by far the fastest conventional high-speed line in the world when it opens. The decrease in travel time from five hours to four also will allow trains to take a far higher percentage of the market share on China&#8217;s most important intercity link. Though three hours is typically seen as the time barrier under which trains can take travel share from airlines, a four hour trip on this corridor will make it a very popular choice for a link that already carries <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jMxTWsJx5NxCN3xxdx71UOf_q4nA">10 percent</a> of the country&#8217;s rail traffic. A trip between the cities today takes around 12 hours by rail.</p>
<p>The distance between Beijing and Shanghai is roughly equivalent to that between New York and Chicago.</p>
<p>China&#8217;s Railway Ministry sees its investment in new corridors as <a href="http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/bizchina/2009-06/24/content_8316014.htm">an essential way</a> to avoid congestion as the country develops. China only has 1/50th of the number of airports as the U.S., but its high-speed railway network, measuring up to 7,000 miles by 2020, will be the longest in the world.</p>
<p>Beijing&#8217;s increased confidence in its capacity to deliver what amounts to the world&#8217;s most advanced high-speed corridor will be buoyed by a favorable stock market reaction, because the country is likely to <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jMxTWsJx5NxCN3xxdx71UOf_q4nA">list a holding company</a> controlling the corridor on the stock market. Doing so would allow China to raise further funds for fast rail expansion, making this corridor only the first among many.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2009/06/25/beijing-shanghai-hsr-link-to-average-speeds-of-over-200-mph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chicago to Benefit from Obama Election; Beijing Commuter Rail; ARC Costs a Lot More</title>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2008/11/07/friday-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2008/11/07/friday-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 12:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yonah Freemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beijing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Honolulu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetransportpolitic.wordpress.com/?p=187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Finally, the end of a long and dramatic week!</p>
<p>The Wall Street Journal had a nice report today about the potential benefits of an Obama Presidency for Chicago, which needs funding for transit as well as for its fledging 2016 Olympics bid. It&#8217;s not hard to imagine that Obama will focus on his adopted home town, especially now that his White House Chief of Staff will be Rahm Emanuel, another Chicago native. Also, one of the new co-chairs of his transition team, Valerie Jarrett, who is the chair of the University of Chicago Medical Center&#8217;s Board, once was the chair the Chicago <p><a href="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2008/11/07/friday-news/">Continue reading this post »</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally, the end of a long and dramatic week!</p>
<p>The Wall Street Journal had <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122601869139207083.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">a nice report</a> today about the potential benefits of an Obama Presidency for <strong>Chicago</strong>, which needs funding for transit as well as for its fledging 2016 Olympics bid. It&#8217;s not hard to imagine that Obama will focus on his adopted home town, especially now that his White House Chief of Staff will be Rahm Emanuel, another Chicago native. Also, one of the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/06/AR2008110603976.html?hpid=topnews">new co-chairs of his transition team</a>, Valerie Jarrett, who is the chair of the University of Chicago Medical Center&#8217;s Board, once was the chair the Chicago Transit Authority and worked in the city planning agency. She will be a strong proponent of transit and smart growth and she&#8217;s a good addition to the Obama team.</p>
<p>We will be discussing Obama&#8217;s influence on specific local projects, including the Chicago Olympics bid, in a post this weekend.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>In <strong>Beijing</strong>, the government has announced the <a href="http://english.people.com.cn/90001/90776/90882/6529609.html">construction of a 100-kilometer suburban rail line</a> which will provide efficient suburb-to-city centre commutes that are currently only realistically possible on the highways in automobiles. This comes on the heels of the <a href="http://english.people.com.cn/90001/90778/90858/90863/6524543.html">city&#8217;s recent announcement</a> that it will built two more subway lines, this in addition to the opening of three lines in July for the Olympic Games. Overall, the city plans 516 km of urban rail by 2015, up from 200 km today.</p>
<p>Note: by 2015, New York City will have (theoretically) completed the first phase of the Second Avenue Subway, a 4 km line. Don&#8217;t laugh, cry.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>Meanwhile, in the <strong>New York Region</strong>, the Access to the Region&#8217;s Core project, which will provide a second rail tunnel from New Jersey to East Midtown, is now estimated to cost $8.7 billion. That&#8217;s $1 billion more than estimated last year. Based on the fact that the states of New York and New Jersey are approaching bankruptcy, either the federal government gets involved to a greater extent or this project isn&#8217;t happening.</p>
<p>Anyone think this project doens&#8217;t make that much sense, anyway? The new tunnels won&#8217;t connect New Jersey riders to the tracks at the existing Penn Station, meaning that through-running Amtrak trains can&#8217;t use them, and the terminus is on the West Side, which New Jersey commuters can already get to. Why isn&#8217;t the station being built in the vicinity of Grand Central instead? It would make a lot more sense.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>Finally, opposition mounts in the Salt Lake area of <strong>Honolulu</strong> following <a href="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2008/11/06/thursday-afternoon-news/">yesterday&#8217;s announcement</a> that the rail line that was approved this week might bypass that area in favor of providing better service to the airport. Expect further controversy before the situation is resolved&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2008/11/07/friday-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

