<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>The Transport Politic</title>
	<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 02:21:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	<!-- generator="WordPress/3.0.1" -->

	<item>
		<title>Stations Picked, Huge Automated Transit Project for Paris is Closer to Realization</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"></p>
<p>» Three intersecting lines will serve mostly circumferential routes around the Paris city core, providing fast trips to a currently under-served clientele.
</p>
<p>In the Western World, the most significant rapid transit project currently being contemplated is Paris&#8217; 96-mile Grand Paris network that would extend brand-new automated rapid transit lines across and around the region at the eye-popping price of more than twenty billion euros. If adequately financed, it would be a huge undertaking designed to speed travel between locales now at the periphery of the region&#8217;s fast transit network, spurring housing and population growth in the metropolitan area&#8217;s suburbs.</p>
<p>Announced more <p><a href="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/09/02/stations-picked-huge-automated-transit-project-for-paris-is-closer-to-realization/">Continue reading this post »</a></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/09/02/stations-picked-huge-automated-transit-project-for-paris-is-closer-to-realization/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>European Transport Agencies Consolidate Intercity Rail Operations in Face of Competition</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"></p>
<p>» As Veolia closes in on Transdev, Deutsche Bahn completes acquisition of Arriva. All before much real competition has begun.</p>
<p>Compared to Western Europe, the U.S.&#8217;s intercity passenger rail system seems positively easy to understand, with exactly one major carrier. The Old Continent has a glut of operators providing services along thousands of miles of travel corridors, representing billions of rides every year. In Western Europe, with serious competition in play in the United Kingdom, Germany, and the Netherlands, this makes for a complex system of corporate link-ups and competing systems, as the chart above shows.</p>
<p>With European Union regulations promoting <p><a href="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/08/30/european-transport-agencies-consolidate-intercity-rail-operations-in-face-of-competition/">Continue reading this post »</a></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/08/30/european-transport-agencies-consolidate-intercity-rail-operations-in-face-of-competition/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>U.S. Withdraws Proposed Freight Rail Regulations But Fails to Address Conflict with Future Passenger Service</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"></p>
<p>» Freight companies rejoice now that they won&#8217;t have to pay for passenger train delays.
</p>
<p>It was inevitable: Distraught by the possibility of having to increasingly open up their tracks to passenger trains, the freight railroad companies have staged an open rebellion against a proposed U.S. policy that would have penalized them if they caused delays.</p>
<p>The rule, which was proposed in May by the Federal Railroad Administration, would have enforced &#8220;stakeholder agreements&#8221; that went along with funding for new or improved intercity rail routes advanced by state governments. In exchange for a public investment in track, signaling, and the like, <p><a href="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/08/27/u-s-withdraws-proposed-freight-rail-regulations-but-fails-to-address-conflict-with-future-passenger-service/">Continue reading this post »</a></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/08/27/u-s-withdraws-proposed-freight-rail-regulations-but-fails-to-address-conflict-with-future-passenger-service/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Politics of Mode Choice</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>» Choice of transportation mode for new transit capital projects is often just as much a reflection of politics as it is a statement of &#8220;objective&#8221; technological benefits.
</p>
<p>Would it be an indictment of the political system to suggest that most political leaders making decisions about what kind of technology to use in new transit corridors simply don&#8217;t care about the relative merits of various transportation modes? If someone were to develop a definitive formula that established, once and for all, the most appropriate technology for any possible corridor, would it matter?</p>
<p>I raise these questions because when put it in the context <p><a href="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/08/25/the-politics-of-mode-choice/">Continue reading this post »</a></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/08/25/the-politics-of-mode-choice/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>For Now, Atlanta Opts to Promote Streetcar Starter Line Over Beltline</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>» Famed inner-city loop will have to wait on the sidelines as downtown streetcar competes for federal TIGER II funds.
</p>
<p>Today is the deadline for applications to the second phase of the U.S. Department of Transportation&#8217;s TIGER program, which provides multi-million dollar grants to transportation projects around the nation based on merit. Cities are likely to submit several billion dollars of proposed projects to compete for a $600 million pot. Unlike the first round, in which Tucson, Detroit, and Dallas received funding for their streetcar lines without having to allocate local funds, this time municipalities are required to contribute 20% of the <p><a href="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/08/23/for-now-atlanta-ops-to-promote-streetcar-starter-line-over-beltline/">Continue reading this post »</a></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/08/23/for-now-atlanta-ops-to-promote-streetcar-starter-line-over-beltline/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Weekend Links</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"></p>
<p>» This week’s big news. Open thread in the comments.</p>
<p>Follow my Twitter account (@ttpolitic) to get news in real time.</p>
<p>On The Transport Politic:</p>

U.S. Announces $8.5 Billion in Requests for High-Speed Funds; $2.3 Billion Available
Can Bike Sharing Work in Cities With Monofunctional Job Centers?
Chicago’s Parking Fiasco Fails to Stem Calls for Privatization of Infrastructure
Chicago’s Plans for a High-Speed Airport Link Revived Thanks to Investor Interest

<p>A note on the last article: In discussing the matter of access between Chicago&#8217;s downtown and its airport, I neglected to mention two important issues about such links that generally apply to places throughout the country. <p><a href="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/08/21/weekend-links-15/">Continue reading this post »</a></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/08/21/weekend-links-15/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Chicago&#8217;s Plans for a High-Speed Airport Link Revived Thanks to Investor Interest</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"></p>
<p>» Mayor Richard Daley hopes for a fully privately funded project connecting downtown with O&#8217;Hare Airport, but the city should be sure not to give away too much in the process.
</p>
<p>Chicago, perhaps like no other city in the United States, has set itself apart as a center of trade, and recently that has been expressed in the growth of its two airports, O&#8217;Hare and Midway. With the resurgence of passenger rail promoted by the Obama Administration, it may be able to reassert its dominance in that field; it will sit at the confluence of three upgraded intercity rail lines <p><a href="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/08/20/chicagos-plans-for-a-high-speed-airport-link-revived-thanks-to-investor-interest/">Continue reading this post »</a></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/08/20/chicagos-plans-for-a-high-speed-airport-link-revived-thanks-to-investor-interest/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Chicago&#8217;s Parking Fiasco Fails to Stem Calls for Privatization of Infrastructure</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"></p>
<p>» As the United Kingdom encourages investors to pony up billions of pounds for its High-Speed 1 route, Chicago&#8217;s sell-off of parking assets comes back to bite.</p>
<p>Who knew an investment in public infrastructure could be so profitable? Or rather, are government entities being bamboozled out of the value of their own property?</p>
<p>About two years ago, Chicago Mayor Richard Daley sold off the rights to 75 years of his city&#8217;s public parking meters for $1.15 billion to a partnership of private companies led by Morgan Stanley. Mayor Daley pushed the city council to approve the deal, since it would mean <p><a href="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/08/19/chicagos-parking-fiasco-fails-to-stem-calls-for-privatization-of-infrastructure/">Continue reading this post »</a></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/08/19/chicagos-parking-fiasco-fails-to-stem-calls-for-privatization-of-infrastructure/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Can Bike Sharing Work in Cities With Monofunctional Job Centers?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"></p>
<p>» London&#8217;s experience may provide a useful example for American cities looking to introduce large bike sharing systems.
</p>
<p>Bike sharing is growing rapidly as the transportation mode du jour; not only have the standardized bikes and their docking stations invaded most major cities across Europe, but they&#8217;re now headed towards introduction in a number of American cities as well. Before investing full-scale in the purchase of thousands of new bikes and the installation of hundreds of docks, U.S. planners should be looking closely at previous experience to determine best practices in system design.</p>
<p>Last month, I laid out my concerns that <p><a href="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/08/18/can-bike-sharing-work-in-cities-with-monofunctional-job-centers/">Continue reading this post »</a></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/08/18/can-bike-sharing-work-in-cities-with-monofunctional-job-centers/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>U.S. Announces $8.5 Billion in Requests for High-Speed Funds; $2.3 Billion Available</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"></p>
<p>» New applications require state commitment of at least 20% of costs for the first time.</p>
<p>For those searching for evidence that interest in high-speed rail extends beyond the borders of the District of Columbia, look no further than the announcement yesterday by the United States Department of Transportation that it has received 77 applications worth $8.5 billion for the agency&#8217;s next allocation of construction grants. States have oversubscribed to a program that only has $2.3 billion in Congressionally approved funds to distribute this year &#8212; and have done so after committing to paying at least 20% of project costs.</p>
<p>In <p><a href="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/08/17/u-s-announces-8-5-billion-in-requests-for-high-speed-funds-2-3-billion-available/">Continue reading this post »</a></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/08/17/u-s-announces-8-5-billion-in-requests-for-high-speed-funds-2-3-billion-available/</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>
