<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="WordPress/2.9.2" -->
<rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>The Transport Politic</title>
	<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 08:19:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	
	<item>
		<title>A Regional Gas Tax Surcharge to Sponsor Infrastructure Investment</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Regional-Fuel-Tax-Surcharge.jpg" rel="lightbox[6306]"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-6308" style="border: 1px solid black;" title="A Regional Fuel Tax Surcharge" src="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Regional-Fuel-Tax-Surcharge.jpg" alt="" width="540" height="577" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">» Expanded taxation at the state level could simplify the financing of regional high-speed rail networks.
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Most of the discussion these days about how to expand funding for alternative transportation revolves around the role of the federal government: everyone in the game seems to be desperately waiting for members of Congress to move forward with a new transportation bill with hopes that senators and representatives will miraculously fall upon a brilliant funding device that will provide <p><a href="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/03/16/a-regional-gas-tax-surcharge-to-sponsor-infrastructure-investment/">Continue reading this post »</a></p><!-- Easy AdSense V2.83 -->
<!-- Post[count: 2] -->
<div class="ezAdsense adsense adsense-leadout" style="text-align:center;margin:12px;"><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-8131222245706143";
/* 468x60, created 1/9/10 */
google_ad_slot = "0236735047";
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></div>
<!-- Easy AdSense V2.83 -->

]]></description>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/03/16/a-regional-gas-tax-surcharge-to-sponsor-infrastructure-investment/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Y-Shaped British HS2 Program to Connect London and Birmingham by 2026</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/United-Kingdom-HS2-Route-Map.jpg" rel="lightbox[6291]"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-6292" style="border: 1px solid black;" title="United Kingdom HS2 Route Map" src="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/United-Kingdom-HS2-Route-Map.jpg" alt="" width="540" height="516" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">» Initial project would link Birmingham to the capital in 49 minutes, but future connections would extend north to Leeds and Manchester.
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The fear that only one section of the United Kingdom&#8217;s Midlands would receive new high-speed rail service has been laid to rest. Hoping to draw unity around a single compromise alignment, UK Secretary of State for Transport Andrew Adonis has drawn out a twenty-year plan that would connect London with Manchester and Leeds via <p><a href="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/03/14/y-shaped-british-hs2-program-to-connect-london-and-birmingham-by-2026/">Continue reading this post »</a></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/03/14/y-shaped-british-hs2-program-to-connect-london-and-birmingham-by-2026/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Decade&#8217;s Top Hits</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/10-Most-Expensive-Projects-of-the-2000s.jpg" rel="lightbox[6283]"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-6274" style="border: 1px solid black;" title="10 Most Expensive North American Transit Projects of the 2000s" src="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/10-Most-Expensive-Projects-of-the-2000s.jpg" alt="" width="540" height="286" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">» The 2000s may have seen the most investment in North American transit ever, with new light rail and metro lines opening from New Jersey to California.
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">I <a href="http://www.infrastructurist.com/2010/03/08/the-10-most-expensive-transit-projects-of-the-decade/">reviewed the biggest transit projects</a> completed in the United States and Canada between 2000 and 2009 on the Infrastructurist a few days ago, but I thought it would be useful to provide a bit more information about how I compiled the data <p><a href="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/03/11/the-decades-top-hits-2/">Continue reading this post »</a></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/03/11/the-decades-top-hits-2/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>New York Regional Rail: A Coda</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/New-York-Regional-Rail-Coda.jpg" rel="lightbox[6140]"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-6142" style="border: 1px solid black;" title="New York Regional Rail Map" src="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/New-York-Regional-Rail-Coda.jpg" alt="" width="540" height="502" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">» This guest post by Alon Levy is the third in a three-part series on a potential New York Regional Rail Network. Check out the <a href="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2009/07/16/regional-rail-for-new-york-city-part-i/">First</a> and <a href="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2009/07/17/regional-rail-for-new-york-city-part-ii/">Second</a> Pieces.
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In a two-part series on The Transport Politic, I previously argued that to improve Greater New York&#8217;s commuter rail service, the agencies controlling it should orient their capital plan to emphasize good service on existing lines instead of spending on outbound extensions, with a special <p><a href="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/03/10/new-york-regional-rail-a-coda/">Continue reading this post »</a></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/03/10/new-york-regional-rail-a-coda/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>China Promotes Its Transcontinental Ambitions with Massive Rail Plan</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Chinese-Transcontinental-High-Speed-Rail-Network.jpg" rel="lightbox[6255]"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-6256" style="border: 1px solid black;" title="Chinese Transcontinental High-Speed Rail Network Map" src="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Chinese-Transcontinental-High-Speed-Rail-Network.jpg" alt="" width="540" height="399" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">» China intends to extend its high-speed rail system towards south Asia and Europe with the goal of two-day journey times between London and Beijing.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">If China weren&#8217;t already halfway through the construction of the <a href="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2009/01/12/high-speed-rail-in-china/">world&#8217;s largest high-speed rail network</a>, it would be difficult to take this proposal seriously. But the most populated country on earth has shown no deficit of skill recently in undertaking massive public works projects, and its ambitions &#8212; and <p><a href="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/03/09/china-promotes-its-transcontinental-ambitions-with-massive-rail-plan/">Continue reading this post »</a></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/03/09/china-promotes-its-transcontinental-ambitions-with-massive-rail-plan/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Benefits and Pitfalls of a National Infrastructure Bank</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-6240" style="border: 1px solid black;" title="European Investment Bank Headquarters" src="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/European-Investment-Bank-Headquarters.png" alt="" width="489" height="254" /></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">» The European Investment Bank and Build America Bonds could serve as a model, but that strategy moves the burden of infrastructure spending to the next generation.
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">If you haven&#8217;t been following lately, it&#8217;s becoming increasingly difficult for members of <a href="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/01/20/financing-transportation-in-an-age-of-political-cowardice/">Congress to get anything done</a>. In terms of transportation, this fact is no laughing matter, because the nation&#8217;s ground transport systems is running on hot air &#8212; deficit spending &#8212; for lack of agreement about how to pull <p><a href="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/03/08/benefits-and-pitfalls-of-a-national-infrastructure-bank/">Continue reading this post »</a></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/03/08/benefits-and-pitfalls-of-a-national-infrastructure-bank/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Reconsidering the Airport Connection: As a Through Station on a Bypass Line</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Greengauge-21s-Heathrow-Opportunity-Plan.png" rel="lightbox[6223]"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-6224" style="border: 1px solid black;" title="Greengauge 21's Heathrow Opportunity Plan" src="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Greengauge-21s-Heathrow-Opportunity-Plan.png" alt="" width="540" height="409" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">» A station at Heathrow looks more promising when envisioned as a connection between the United Kingdom&#8217;s northern and southern rail networks.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In my Friday article on the brewing controversy over <a href="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/03/05/high-speed-rails-airport-connection/">whether to link Heathrow Airport</a> to the United Kingdom&#8217;s proposed HS2 high-speed rail network, I dismissed the idea rather quickly, arguing that the airport station proposed by the Conservative Party would multiply construction costs and increase travel times. Because Heathrow is not directly on <p><a href="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/03/07/reconsidering-the-airport-connection-as-a-through-station-on-a-bypass-line/">Continue reading this post »</a></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/03/07/reconsidering-the-airport-connection-as-a-through-station-on-a-bypass-line/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>High-Speed Rail&#8217;s Airport Connection</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Aeroport-Lyon-St.-Exupéry.jpg" rel="lightbox[5018]"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-6207" style="border: 1px solid black;" title="Aeroport Lyon St. Exupéry" src="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Aeroport-Lyon-St.-Exupéry.jpg" alt="" width="520" height="390" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">» The British government is set to produce a high-speed plan that does not include a direct connection to Heathrow Airport. Is that a problem?
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">It&#8217;s one of the <a href="http://www.midwesthsr.org/network/airport.html">standard arguments</a> made by promoters of high-speed rail: by investing in multimodal hubs at airports, trains can reduce congestion in the air by encouraging people flying short journeys to switch to rail, even while expanding access to long-distance routes only feasible by airplane. The <a href="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2009/03/05/bay-areas-mtc-chooses-oakland-airport-connector-for-stimulus-funds/">argument is <p><a href="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/03/05/high-speed-rails-airport-connection/">Continue reading this post »</a></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/03/05/high-speed-rails-airport-connection/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>New York Plans Transitway on 34th Street, but It&#8217;s Not BRT, for Better or Worse</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/34th-Street-Transitway.png" rel="lightbox[6193]"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-6194" style="border: 1px solid black;" title="34th Street Transitway" src="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/34th-Street-Transitway.png" alt="" width="540" height="291" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">» The project represents a marked advance for a city that&#8217;s been reluctant to invest in fully separated lanes for its buses.
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">When American transit planners begin working on a new transit capital project, they&#8217;re often required to undertake what&#8217;s called an alternative analysis, a study whose purpose is to identify the appropriate route and technology for a specific corridor. It&#8217;s an open secret among people in the industry that while these reports often provide useful information about <p><a href="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/03/04/new-york-plans-transitway-on-34th-street-but-its-not-brt-for-better-or-worse/">Continue reading this post »</a></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/03/04/new-york-plans-transitway-on-34th-street-but-its-not-brt-for-better-or-worse/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Wisconsin Moves Ahead with Train Purchase Deal, Intent on Connecting Madison with Milwaukee</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-6181" style="border: 1px solid black;" title="Talgo Series VIII" src="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Talgo-Series-VIII.png" alt="" width="520" height="301" /></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">» Talgo will establish train manufacturing plant in Milwaukee. But state Republicans suggest they&#8217;ll oppose rail expansion if it gets in the way of highway spending.
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Despite being a marginal player in the world high-speed rail market, Spanish train manufacturer <a href="http://www.talgoamerica.com/">Talgo</a> is hoping to make a big push for orders in  North America. Thanks to a deal it signed with Wisconsin last year, it&#8217;s well on its way: The company has agreed to locate a new U.S. plant in <p><a href="http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/03/03/wisconsin-moves-ahead-with-train-purchase-deal-intent-on-connecting-madison-with-milwaukee/">Continue reading this post »</a></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/03/03/wisconsin-moves-ahead-with-train-purchase-deal-intent-on-connecting-madison-with-milwaukee/</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>
