Categories
Finance President

Recovery.gov Now Live; Timeline for Grants Now Available

Stimulus bill can be tracked as money is distributed

The economic stimulus bill, which was signed a few hours ago by President Obama, will now be tracked online via the website Recovery.gov. As of now, the site doesn’t have much, but it will be updated with information about the use of the bill’s $790 billion in expenditures.

The page does have more detailed information and when we’ll know when grants will be awarded and reviewed. Here’s a short resume:

  • February 17, 2009 – Bill signed into law
  • February 19 – Federal agencies begin reporting block grant awards
  • March 3 – Federal agencies begin reporting use of funds
  • March 17 – First DOT reports made to Congress – fund-tracking begins
  • April 17 – Second DOT reports made to Congress
  • May 3 – Federal agencies to make performance plans available; will begin reporting on allocations for entitlement programs
  • May 15 – Detailed agency financial reports to be available
  • May 17 – Use it or Lose It: Any funds not obligated will be redistributed to DOT or other states
  • May 20 – Federal agencies to begin reporting competitive grants and contracts
  • June 17 – Third DOT reports made to Congress
  • July 15 – Fund recipients to begin reporting on the use of funds
  • August 17 – Fourth DOT reports made to Congress
  • February 17, 2010 – Fifth DOT reports made to Congress
  • February 17, 2012 – Final DOT reports made to Congress

What does all this mean? In two days, we’ll have final numbers about where the formula-based awards to transit systems ($6.9 billion) will be going; these numbers are already basically known because they’re based on a standard population and transit use-base formula that’s been used in the past. Between March and May, we’ll hear back on for what exactly the transit agencies are using the money (the transport politic reported a few weeks back, for instance, that New York was likely to use its funds to build the Fulton Street Transit Center). We should also hear a word or two from Amtrak, which is to receive $1.3 billion.

On May 20, we’ll hear how the following competitive grants have been awarded:

  • New Starts ($750 million)
  • High-Speed Rail ($8 billion)
  • Discretionary Grants for transportation ($1.5 billion)

This means that between now and May, transit agencies and state departments of transportation are going to be jockeying like hell to get some of the money listed above, especially since, as Transportation for America puts it, rail proposals do not have to be in pre-existing state plans. Theoretically, states could come up with proposals between now and May that had never before been considered seriously at the state or the national levels. We’ll probably see proposals going out before the grants are awarded.

By the way, I argued in the previous post that we’d be needing a second stimulus package; the idea hasn’t been ruled out by the administration.

Categories
Congress President

Obama Criticizes Sprawl; Stimulus Bill Passes Senate

A brief post, describing what’s already been well detailed by others:

1. Today in Florida, President Obama said the following:

“It’s imagining new transportation systems. I’d like to see high speed rail where it can be constructed. I would like for us to invest in mass transit because potentially that’s energy efficient. And I think people are a lot more open now to thinking regionally…

“The days where we’re just building sprawl forever, those days are over. I think that Republicans, Democrats, everybody… recognizes that’s not a smart way to design communities. So we should be using this money to help spur this sort of innovative thinking when it comes to transportation.

“That will make a big difference.”

Three cheers for Mr. President! Now what will he do to encourage investment in high-speed rail and mass transit?

Read Streetsblog or T4A for more.

2. The Senate passed the stimulus bill, in a vote of 61-37.

Three Republicans agreed to the deal. Now on to the conference committee.

We’ll see what Congress can agree to in terms of transit and rail funding.

Read the transport politic’s comparison of the House and Senate bills (which now must be compromised), or the NYT‘s description.

Categories
President

Happy Inauguration Day

the transport politic has been following transportation for the past three months, from just before the election to today, the most significant political turnover in eight years – or perhaps in twenty-eight, since 1981, when Ronald Reagan told hold of the White House.

There is little doubt that I’ve found many ways to criticize the incoming Obama administration, especially in recent weeks as it has become evident that the stimulus bill will not emphasize transit or rail.

But there is little doubt that the Obama administration represents a sea change from what we’ve come to expect from the Bush administration. The Republican tax-cut, reduce-public-services, and fight-war mentality appears to have come to its rightful end.

As a result, I can’t help but be optimistic about what the next four or eight years will bring. To a new and better America!

Categories
DOT President

LaHood Confirmation Delayed; Obama Briefing Book Highlights Rail Investment

Our failure earlier this evening to be available for a live-blog of the confirmation hearing for Secretary of Transportation-designate Ray LaHood turns out to have been unimportant. Mr. LaHood’s hearing was postponed to next week because, as the New York Times puts it, “A Senate aide who asked not to be named said that Mr. LaHood’s paperwork had not been sent over by the transition staff, and may not be completed yet.” This would sound innocent enough.

Yet as Hugh Bartling pointed out (thanks to Streetsblog.net) this morning, today’s Washington Post broke the devastating news that just last year, Mr. LaHood sponsored $60 million of earmarks, at least $9 million of which went directly to campaign donors. $7.8 million of that money went to Caterpillar, a company from his district. That puts him in the top 10% of congressmen in terms of the amount of funds he got out of Congress for his pet projects.

Does this put Mr. LaHood in a troubling position? At this point, it’s hard to tell. Mr. Obama has stated his opposition to the use of earmarks, which are usually placed in bills without the consent of the full assembly and which reward communities with funds not based on actual need but instead on the strength of their respective congressmen. So will Mr. Obama have second thoughts about appointing a man who has taken full advantage of the earmarking system? Is that why his hearing was delayed today? Or should we trust the official version of events?

We’ve been disappointed with the selection of Mr. LaHood since his candidature became clear on December 17th last year. He has no strong transportation background, and he’s often been an advocate of roads rather than the development of transit. He’s been a willing – but not excited – supporter of Amtrak. Is this the person we need in charge of the huge infrastructure-building component of the stimulus package? Is the news that he was willing to direct funds directly to a local corporation through the earmark system bad enough to merit replacing him with someone more friendly to our interests? We’ll wait and see.

There is one place where people aren’t waiting-and-seeing on transportation matters, however: on the new Citizen’s Briefing Book established by the President-Elect to allow individuals to suggest ideas about how to improve the country. And guess what’s number one on the list so far? A proposal for “Bullet Trains & Light Rail.” The suggestion encourages “bullet trains” (no specific definition given) between cities and removing funding from highway construction for light rail building. We like what we see, and we’re glad that the people who have voted so far seem to agree.

The overwhelmingly positive response in favor of these rail initiatives again has stoked the attention of the administration, and another video released by Change.gov this afternoon addressed the issue. Chair-designee for the White House Council on Environmental Quality Nancy Sutley says the following in the video at the bottom of the post:

“When I talk to people and they ask me what I can do to reduce their carbon footprint and to reduce their environmental impact, one of the very easy things many people can do is to use transit. Even just one day a week or replacing one car trip a week by using transit will help the environment and help lower your carbon footprint and your environmental impact. And high-speed rail is an idea that’s really taking off across the country, in the way of linking our communities together, making travel fast and efficient, and environmentally – having fewer environmental impacts. I’m from California, and we just voted for high-speed rail and we’re very excited about it, and so we’ll be really excited to look into high-speed rail and see what we can do to support high-speed rail and to support transit in our economic recovery package.”

Once again: good comments from the Obama administration-to-be. Important points the policy-makers are pushing here:

  • Using transit is a good way to help the environment
  • High-speed rail is good at connecting communities quickly and is environmentally friendly
  • California high-speed rail is a good project
  • We can use the economic recovery package to support transit and high-speed rail

We’ll focus on the last point, and keep looking forward to good news.

What change we hope this new administration brings.*

* Sarcasm will be muted if and when action proves the motto is justified.

Categories
Finance President

Incoming Administration Again Addresses Non-Automobile Transportation in Video

A new video from the Office of the President-Elect features a group of individuals working on Barack Obama’s economic recovery plan discussing how the plan will help stimulate the country, focusing on infrastructure, education, the environment, and health care. The video (at the bottom of this post) is meant as a preview before the coming public release of the plan’s text, and there’s good news in this video for transportation activists.

In the video, Madhuri Kommareddi, a member of the Economic Policy Team, discusses mass transit directly:

“[People] also probably see their drive times significantly increase as congestion has increased dramatically across the country, especially in a number of growing population centers.”

“Infrastructure is a part of his plans for a number of reasons. First, it can help simulate an immediate job creation, which is a central component of the President-Elect’s economy recovery plan. Second, it’s an opportunity for us to meet a lot of those unmet needs that have really grown over the past several years, and in some cases several decades. The President-elect very much wants to look at forward-thinking investments. How can we expand our public transit systems?“

The video includes a clip of a congested highway, followed by a subway train entering a station, while she’s talking. Like the video released a few days ago, this clip provides us a heartened reprieve from the incessant “roads and bridges” rhetoric of Mr. Obama himself, which seemingly precluded any interest in alternative transportation. This clip, on the other hand, implicitly suggests that investment in mass transit is a good alternative to the congestion in our cities.

This video’s content bodes well for the bill’s language.